Women currently represent fifteen percent of military personnel, and their presence is increasing among new recruits, up twenty-five percent in the A ir Force.
On the other hand, my fellow male soldiers that participated in the survey have mixed reactions. 20% of the participants still stand on the ground that women do not have a necessary competence to be included into these military specialties. Their argument is that women naturally lack physical capacity and are weak when it comes to handling of emotional restraints in the battlefield. With this assumption they feel that it would affect the readiness of the unit and cohesion of the members. Their observation is that the aspect portrays that the operation within the unit calls for people with willingness and physique. However, 80% percent of these participants feel that they have confidence in women. They are convinced that if they are properly trained like the male soldiers and given exposure, then there is no reason that can prevent them from taking the responsibilities in these units. The argument is that Congress should realize that its time they gave a ‘go’ permission for the women to lead units like armory, infantry and field artillery (Newby et al. 817). They added that the opposing policies act as an insult to women and have continuously destroyed the relationship between men and women in the force. Another group that contributed to the survey is the general public. 70% of the contributors felt that these polices have undermined the capability of the modern woman. They argue that time has gone when women were seen as household figures that could not handle manual or decisions tasks. They added that they should be given a chance and their failure judged from their performance. However, 18% of the male contributors think that reevaluation of this policies would be like committing a suicide by the military fraternity. They have based their argument on the fact that this would switch the attention of the males to pleasing the females in order to win their affection. Moreover, they added that if it must be done, then they should have their separate units comprising female soldiers only. Nonetheless, 12% have no clear ground on this issue. Their word is that they are comfortable with the current situation. They feel that any change makes no difference, since the superiority complex of the male species will never let women feel comfortable in these units. They will strive to cause discomfort to make women quit. On the contrary, by going with the majority stand, the argument still stands that the Congress must realize the need to reevaluate this policy. Majority seem to agree that in distribution of privileges there should be equality of gender.
This essay discusses women in the military
The second part of my proposal is that the military should create separate facilities and ground units for the women in order to help prevent sexual harassment and assault, which are common issues in the military.
Pros & Cons for Women Joining the Military | Career Trend
Regardless of the many substantial contributions women have made to the United States military from the American Revolutionary war to the contemporary Iraq and Afghanistan wars, it has long been a sanctuary of masculinity, which consequently, has resulted in the organization’s steadfast resistance against women’s direct martial participation.
Free Women Military Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe
- This research paper on women in the military look into the history of how women became more involved in the military, from serving as undercover troops to serving as military nurses, in the 20th century.
Free Women Military papers, essays, ..
Ninety percent of the female participants in the survey, who are female soldiers, seem to concur with the idea that the Congress needs to reevaluate this discriminative policies. They continue to add that this is a breach of human rights where they have been discriminated according to gender parity. Their argument has been that the military community has not been exhaustive in development of leaders that are diverse in comparison to the entity that they protect. As per the contribution made by retired female soldiers, denying women post in army specialties and Marine Corps has demoralized the women are also served as barricade to their advancement and promotion. The statistics shows that 14% of the whole force comprises women in uniform. However, the number of female officers that holds higher ranks remains negligible compared to the male officers (Granados et al. 970). The point being conveyed by the group together with their supporters is that the female BEING has been denied a chance to realize her potential. According to Anu Bhagwati, a retired marine captain, the policy is nothing but a solid block wall to women’s advancement. She adds that it has no reflection of the much contributions and sacrifices made by women in the disciplinary forces, and it carries wrong presumptions of the modern warfare doctrine. The general feeling of the victims is that reevaluation of the policy would be like a sort of respect and fairness to the long-time oppressed group of people. Moreover, this would exercise democracy and respect of all human rights as per international agreement. They feel that this would be an act of appreciation of many services given by the female soldiers’ fraternity in securing the nations’ sovereignty. The gravity of the message conveyed by both current and retired women in the force is that women have equal rights as their male counterparts and they should be viewed as having the same capacity as men.