Ernesto Miranda was arrested for the kidnaping andrape of a young woman. Upon arrest Miranda was questioned for twohours. He never asked for a lawyer and eventually confessed to thecrime. Later, however, a lawyer representing Miranda appealed thecase to the Supreme Court claiming that Miranda's rights had beenviolated.
Free judicial system papers, essays, and research papers. The Supreme Court of the United States encompasses the federal judiciary, explicitly the judicial
In Supreme Court Opinions, Web Links to Nowhere - The …
The Supreme Court of the United States upheld thelower court's decision in favor of the United States. The Court saidthat Debs had actually planned to discourage people from enlisting inthe Armed Forces. The Court refused to grant him protection under theFirst Amendment freedom of speech clause, stating that Debs "usedwords [in his speech] with the purpose of obstructing the recruitingservice." Debs' conviction under the Espionage Act would stand,because his speech represented a "clear and present danger" to thesafety of the United States. (Source - PATCH - See link below)
The Supreme Court's Travel Ban Off-Ramp - The Atlantic
Johnson's conviction was overturned by theSupremeCourt of Texas, which ruled that this mode of self-expression wasprotected under the First Amendment to theConstitution. The SupremeCourt upheld this ruling, stating the flag burning was "expressiveconduct" because it was an attemptto "convey a particularizedmessage."
The Supreme Court's Travel Ban Off-Ramp
The Supreme Court of the United States said thateducation is a property interest protected by the FourteenthAmendment's due process clause and any suspension requires priornotice and a hearing. Permitting suspension without a hearing is,therefore, unconstitutional. The Court said that oral or writtennotice of the charges brought against a student must be given to thestudent who is being suspended for more than a trivial period. If hedenies the charges, the student must be given a hearing. The hearingmay be an informal one where the student is simply given anexplanation of the evidence against him and an opportunity to tellhis side of the story. (Source - PATCH - See link below)
Supreme Court clerks are mostly white and male. Just …
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled infavor of the students, saying that the books were not requiredreading. According to Justice Brennan, who cited West Virginia Boardof Education v. Bamette, 319 U.S.624 (1943), "Local school boards maynot remove books from school library shelves simply because theydislike the ideas contained in these books and seek by their removalto prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism,religion, or other matters of opinion." He also cited Tinker v. DesMoines School District, 393 U.S.503 (1969), saying that high schoolstudents have First Amendment rights in the classroom. Although theschools have a right to determine the content of their libraries,they may not interfere with a student's right to learn. Therefore,the schools may not control their libraries in a manner that resultsin a narrow, partisan view of certain matters of opinion. The Courtstood against the removal or suppression of ideas in schools.
Meet Patricia Millett, hero judge and the Democrats’ …
At issue was whether Yates' First Amendment rightto freedom of speech protected his advocating the forceful overthrowof the government. The Supreme Court of the United States said thatfor the Smith Act to be violated, people must be encouraged to dosomething, rather than merely to believe in something. The Court drewa distinction between a statement of an idea and the advocacy that acertain action be taken. The Court ruled that the Smith Act did notprohibit "advocacy of forcible overthrow of the government as anabstract doctrine." The convictions of the indicted members werereversed. (Source - PATCH - See link below)