This opens a new can or worms in which the attempt by the apologists have switched from determining whether or not Joseph had sexual relations to defining what adultery is and defining what a legal marriage is. This becomes an exhausting exercise. The critic typically contends that a definition for adultery is pretty simple: a married person having sexual relations with someone other than their legally married spouse. It becomes convoluted because the apologist wants to reframe the debate by looking at a new interpretation for what constitutes adultery and how one interprets "marriage" and the marriage contract: the apologist contends that the "marriages"/"sealings" are based on God's new interpretation and that they supersede any civil definitions or laws; and the critic takes a simple stance that a legal marriage is one recognized by civil law. (This is an excellent topic to apply to. To convince someone that there are nuanced and different definitions for marriage and adultery, a lot of effort must be spent in weaving that tapestry, including denying or creatively interpreting Joseph's own writings and denials.)
In sum, Ima Kriteck's essay provides us with a correct reminder that Madame Bovary .must be read and appreciated for the richly textured surface layer of its love scenes involving Charles and Emma (convincingly arguing therefore that the novel is an erotic masterpiece), but she fails in her secondary effort to persuade that Charles' eroticism should be our sole focus in looking for erotic layers beneath the surface.
Huck, Emma and Asher: A Critical Analysis - Essay Example
Joseph's first wife Emma gave the prophet considerable grief over the practice of plural marriage. That's understandable as she had no witness that it was really true and she often denied that her husband even practiced polygamy. She told her sons that their father never practiced polygamy, which is one of the main reasons the RLDS Church was even formed. We have to wonder why an angel didn't appear to Emma to convince her that polygamy was commanded by God.
Free Essays on America papers, essays, and research papers.
Polygamous "marriages" were conducted in secret by Joseph Smith as early as 1833/35 (even though the sealing power wasn't restored until 1836 and D&C 132 outlining the rules of polygamy was not given until 1843) and by a few select members beginning in 1843. Throughout this time, the Church publicly lied that any devout leaders were involved in polygamy. Joseph eventually "married" at least 32 women in addition to Emma Smith, including 7 girls under the age of 18 (the youngest being 14) and at least 11 women who were simultaneously married to other men. If plural marriage is necessary to have more children, then why did Joseph Smith take plural wives who already had husbands and why didn't his plural wives bear him children? If polygamy is still part of LDS doctrine, why does the Church insist that new converts in polygamous families (in countries where it is legal) split up their families before they can be baptized? In direct opposition to Article of Faith 12, the Church broke the laws of the land by practicing polygamy.
Browse By Author: G - Project Gutenberg
[Critical Evaluation section-->] Kriteck's article is quite useful, instructing the reader to reconsider the critical tradition surrounding the novel and provoking a new and necessary look at Charles Bovary,the character, after all, whom we meet first in the novel and who survives Emma at the end. [
Emma Swan | Once Upon a Time Wiki | FANDOM powered …
In spite of her insistence that Charles should be viewed as the major source of the novel's erotic power, Kriteck's bringing forward the surface layer of the scenes Charles and Emma play, with attention to Flaubert's imagery and sensual symbolism, and her celebratory reading of Charles' smoldering, latent erotic fire, are not only instructive, but also provocative. Her reminders that Charles is an important figure in the novel and that his courtship and hopes in marriage are organically integrated with Emma's psychology is important, for these reminders bring readers back to the aesthetic trope that Narcissism is what makes love immortal. Kriteck also provides a very useful analysis of Charles' intellectual and emotional processes in his love scenes with Emma and in the heart of his erotic dreams, as well as a plausible explanation for the way Emma continues to control Charles "from the grave" as Flaubert writes.